Association between Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Health and Different Prosthetic Emergence Angles in Esthetic Areas: Digital Evaluation after 3 Years' Function
Journal of Clinical Medicine 11 :6243 (2022)
Abstract
Background: The aim of the present retrospective study was to assess peri-implant soft tissue health for implants restored with different prosthetic emergence profile angles. Methods: Patients were treated with implants supporting fixed dentures and were followed for 3 years. Buccal emergence angle (EA) measured at 3 years of follow-up visits (t1) were calculated for two different groups: Group 1 (153 implants) for restorations with angle between implant axis and prosthetic emergence angle from ≥30°, and Group 2 (67 implants) for those with angle ≤30°, respectively. Image J software was used for the measurements. Moreover, peri-implant soft tissue parameters such as pocket probing depth (PPD), plaque index (PI) and gingival index (GI) were assessed, respectively. Results: A total of 57 patients were included in the analysis and a total of 220 implants were examined. Mean (±SD) EA in Groups 1 and 2 was 46.4 ± 12.2 and 24.5 ± 4.7 degrees, respectively. After 3 years of follow-up, a PPD difference of 0.062 mm (CI95% −0.041 mm; 0.164 mm) was calculated between the two groups and was not statistically significant (p = 0.238). Similar results were found for PI (OR = 0.78, CI95% 0.31; 1.98, p = 0.599). Furthermore, GI scores of 2 and 3 were found for nine implants (5.9%) in Group 1, and for five implants in Group 2 (7.5%). A non-significant difference (p = 0.76) was found. Conclusions: Peri-implant soft-tissue health does not seem to be influenced by EA itself, when a proper emergence profile is provided for implant-supported reconstructions in anterior areas.
Keywords
Citazione
Lops D, Romeo E, Calza S, Palazzolo A, Viviani L, Salgarello S, Buffoli B, Mensi M. Association between Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Health and Different Prosthetic Emergence Angles in Esthetic Areas: Digital Evaluation after 3 Years' Function. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022;11:6243. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216243
Study Highlights
This retrospective study (n=57 patients, 220 implants) evaluated whether prosthetic emergence angle (EA) affects peri-implant soft tissue health in anterior esthetic zones after 3 years of function.
Groups:
- Group 1: EA ≥30° (n=153 implants), mean EA 46.4 ± 12.2°
- Group 2: EA <30° (n=67 implants), mean EA 24.5 ± 4.7°
Key findings at 3-year follow-up:
| Parameter | Group 1 (≥30°) | Group 2 (<30°) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| PPD (mean) | 1.86 mm | 1.81 mm | 0.238 |
| PI positive | 82% | 87% | 0.599 |
| GI = 0 | 94% | 93% | 0.76 |
Clinical implications:
- EA >30° does not negatively influence peri-implant soft tissue health when a concave emergence profile is used
- Proper emergence profile design (concave in transition zone) is more important than the angle itself
- Access to oral hygiene procedures must be guaranteed regardless of EA
- More prospective long-term data needed to confirm these findings
Implant system: Anyridge (MegaGen), submerged healing, 1–2 mm sub-crestal placement